Is The NCAA In The Way Of High School And College Sports?

Are there too many rules and regulations set by the NCAA that slows down the college recruiting process?

Are there too many ridiculous NCAA rules that hurt college sports?

We all know that the NCAA is the governing body of all of college athletics. The NCAA has their hand in high school athletics as well.  I think the NCAA is a little bit slow and outdated when it comes to the modern world of athletics.

I understand there has to be rules to protect the student athletes and I’m really OK with that part of the NCAA.

A college coach making too many phone calls to a student athlete that they are trying to recruit to another college program, I don’t see why that would be considered wrong.  The NCAA has penalized college programs for excess phone calls to recruits; they’ve also penalize college programs for having barbecues where potential recruits were in attendance and again, what’s wrong with that?

There’re restrictions on phone calls, there’re restrictions on texting student athletes, there’s close scrutiny with Facebook and Twitter and I say what is the big deal?

All of these things mentioned are very harmless. I know you can’t give money to high school recruits or gifts to persuade a student athlete to your college program; we all know that’s illegal and wrong.

This generation of high school athletes is totally different from players 30 years ago.  These young players today expect something in return, other than a full athletic scholarship, for their athletic ability that generates millions of dollars to that university.  The players are not blind; they see the amounts of money being made because of what they do on the football field, the basketball court or anywhere else money is being made.

Just about every day when I watch ESPN there’s always a story about the NCAA opening an investigation about a college athletic program.  Sometimes the infractions, like with the OhioStatefootball program, are major and other times the infractions are so small that it makes no sense to even mention them at all. Getting a tattoo in exchange for an autographed football helmet is enough to destroy an entire football program and get the coach to resign.  Why?? How is this a crime? Who, in this entire scenario, is being victimized?

When the NCAA does decide to punish an athletic program it’s only hurting the student athletes who are still there and who’ve done nothing wrong to receive such punish. That is totally unfair to them.  What the NCAA should do is fine these college programs millions of dollars and the coach must be fired or banned from coaching for a particular period of time.  In the situation atOhioState, the university should be fined millions of dollars and the coach must lose his job for a certain amount of years.

John Calipari, the head men’s basketball coach at Kentucky, is the coach who had major NCAA violations at the University of Memphis and at the University of Mass.  But the entire school was punished. It had to give up victories and was put on probation but the coach received no punishment at all.  Coach Calipari was free to leave those programs and get another coaching job without any problems. John Calipari can break the rules, leave the school and the players he’s leaving behind have to serve his punishment.  That is totally wrong and unfair to college athletics overall.

There’s going to come a time where big-time major college programs are going to get sick and tired of the NCAA and form their own league and create their own governing body.  Any time major college football programs can switch to new conferences or even think about switching to another conference makes it a possibility that the top 30 college programs in this country can form a new league.

The University of Texas has a television network called the Longhorn Network. This will create millions of dollars for the University of Texas.  Many other major programs might end up starting their own TV networks so they can have more control of their money which will give them more power to do what they want to do.

I can see a time where there will be separate college conferences away from the NCAA where the players will receive some type of compensation and there will be more modern and updated rules to accommodate this generation of student athletes.

If you like this blog post, then please sign up for my weekly newsletter. It’s free! We also offer college recruiting tips and information along with reviews on sports athletic products and gear.

Ieshuh Griffin, “Not the whiteman’s bitch,” fights election rules

​Ieshuh Griffin is at it again: Fighting a battle against election rules and what she calls a “a very corrupt government” in Milwaukee.

She gained national notoriety last year for her co…
The Blotter

KU Rules Out Barnhart; Targets 2 New Candidates

Two weeks ago I reported that current Univ. of Kentucky Athletic Director Mitch Barnhart and Tulsa Athletic Director Bubba Cunningham were getting heavy consideration for the vacant Kansas Athletic Director position.

Mitch Barnhart Kentucky Athletic Director To Interview With Kansas

(No interview? Thank you come again)

After my report, Barnhart released a statement that included, “I have not been formally contacted by the University of Kansas. I am 100 percent focused on UK Athletics.”

From what I was told today by a source, Barnhart won’t have to worry about Kansas distracting him any longer.

Because of my report, Barnhart subsequently communicated to those associated with the search for the new Kansas AD that he was still interested in the job, but that he couldn’t interview in order to keep up appearances in Lexington.

In other words, if KU wanted Barnhart, it would have to hire him without an interview.

That didn’t go over so well in Lawrence, so Barnhart is no longer a candidate for the job.

That leaves current Tulsa Athletic Director Bubba Cunningham as the leading candidate for the job.

I’ve also been told of two other candidates that Kansas now is targeting for the job: (more…)

SPORTSbyBROOKS

Rush Limbaugh Mocks NFL’s New Rules To Prevent Head Injuries (Audio)

Rush Limbaugh’s no stranger to controversy of any kind, and matters relating to the NFL are no exception. (Remember this?) More recently, he wondered about the amount of pink apparel the league’s selling, and now he’s (sort of) taking on the league’s new rules for dangerous hits.

It seems Rush is worried the new rules could lead to a similar situation to one the military proposed, where troops would be awarded medals for “courageous restraint” in situations where their actions helped avoid civilian casualties. (Rush’s totally not predictable feelings on this can be found here.)

Limbaugh himself, though, actually showed some restraint in this instance – it’s one of the calmer segments you might hear out of him (maybe because he already made his views on “courageous restraint” awards so clear). Audio below.

[H/T Media Matters]

SportsGrid

The NFL’s New Overtime Rules For The Playoffs, Explained

The NFL’s new overtime format has been met with mostly positive feedback, and only minimal negative (see Payton, Sean). Jake Simpson of The Atlantic is so happy he boldly proclaimed that “football is fair again.”

For those not in the know of the new overtime rules, that’s what were are here for. First, let’s brush up on the old format that will still be used during the regular season: It’s simple a coin toss decides who gets the ball, and the first team to score wins. That format leaves the fate of the game in the hands of a coin, since every team who wins the toss will elect to receive, they only have to potentially go 35 yards to set up a game-winning field goal. (Okay well almost every team will elect to receive, I’m looking at you Marty Mornhinweg)

The new rules, which will be adopted for the playoffs only are a hybrid of the current format and the college setup. Basically, if the team who starts with the ball goes down and scores a touchdown the game is over, but if they only get a field goal the other team has one chance to answer back.

If the team with the ball first has to punt, or there is a turnover, it goes straight to sudden-death. The nice tweak they added gives teams more incentive of scoring a touchdown, and makes the chance higher that both teams will have the ball.

Take it away, Simpson:

“The problem with the old system is blindingly obvious to anyone with common sense or a high school understanding of math.”

Photo via Follow me on Twitter.

[NFL's New Overtime Rule: Making Football Fair Again] The Atlantic

SportsGrid