Barnes Named To AP Preseason All-America Team

Crazy hype.

University of North Carolina freshman forward Harrison Barnes has earned a spot on the Associated Press Preseason All-America team, the AP announced on Monday. Barnes is the first freshman to earn a spot on the team since its inception prior to the 1986-87 season.

“This is indicative of the great respect that Harrison has nationally, and it’s an unbelievable accomplishment for a freshman,” UNC head coach Roy Williams says. “I know Harrison would agree, however, that it would be even more exciting to make the All-America team that’s picked after the season.

“So far in practice, he has shown the ability to grasp things that we are teaching very quickly, he has tremendous concentration and I fully expect that he is going to be a very important player for us from day one.”

I know. No one besides people who were in Bahamas and those camped out courtside in Greensboro on Sunday have seen the kid play in a UNC uniform. However, there is also an incredible level of unanimity in the general opinions expressed by smart people and those who write columns(not necessarily one in the same mind you.) We are also talking about a player who every recruiting ranking out there had #1, well except for Rivals.com who ranked Josh Selby at #1 and Barnes at #2 presumably because they are complete idiots or lost a bet. I hope it is the latter because I would hate to think they are dumb enough to think a player(Selby) who two different services had as low as #12 should top the rankings ahead of a player(Barnes) who everyone thinks is the 2nd coming of <insert NBA star here>.

Interesting enough this is the first time a freshman has ever been tabbed for first team All-America in the preseason. People were obviously high on John Wall last season but not so much they tabbed him for this honor.

Exit question: Given Duke’s Kyle Singler is also on the AP All-America team, can we assume the matchup of Barnes vs Singler in at least two games this season is going to be off the scale epic?

Tar Heel Fan

Did ‘open competition’ for starting positions on the Detroit Pistons materialize in the preseason?

When Pistons coach John Kuester declared early in training camp that starting positions were ‘up for grabs’, his statement elicited its share of “Psshh … we’ll believe it when we see it” responses.

With a veteran-dominated team virtually every year of the Joe Dumars era, and a starting lineup that has had a minimum of three (and as many as five) spots set in stone for the last nine years or so, it’s understandable why many wouldn’t possibly believe that players like Rip Hamilton, Tayshaun Prince or Ben Wallace would be in any danger of not starting. And although he doesn’t qualify as a member of the championship core of veterans, the team’s commitment to Rodney Stuckey at the starting point guard spot has been unwavering for the last two seasons, making him seem like a virtual lock for the starting lineup as well.

With all four of those players presumably starting the season-opener, joined by first-time starter Austin Daye, it’s conceivable to believe that this ‘open competition’ was more coach-speak and didn’t actually materialize. In reality, four of the five starting spots had clear winners, and the fifth had both candidates perform poorly. Here’s a breakdown:

Point Guard

The Candidates: Stuckey, Will Bynum

The Preseason Stats:

  • Stuckey: 8 games/27.9 minutes/16.2 points/3.1 rebounds/4.8 assists/3.0 turnovers/1.0 steals/47 percent shooting/15 percent three-point shooting/90 percent free throw shooting/- 10
  • Bynum: 6 games/30.3 minutes/10.3 points/3.2 rebounds/5.0 assists/2.7 turnovers/1.0 steals/48 percent shooting/36 percent three-point shooting/78 percent free throw shooting/+ 1

The Per-36 Minute Stats:

  • Stuckey: 20.8 points/4.0 rebounds/6.1 assists/3.9 turnovers/1.3 steals/6.6 free throws attempted
  • Bynum: 12.3 points/5.9 rebounds/5.9 assists/3.2 turnovers/1.2 steals/4.5 free throws attempted

Key stats for Stuckey: His per-36 numbers in the preseason were very strong, although he was helped greatly by closing the preseason with two fantastic games offensively. But one stat that was consistent for him throughout the preseason: he’s getting to the line very frequently. If he can continue getting to the line six or more times per game, that will be a huge plus for him. And his overall 47 percent shooting in the preseason was a very good sign. For a guy who gets so many of his points inside of 15 feet, his career shooting percentage is way too low.

His 1.6-to-1 assist-to-turnover ratio this preseason was bad. Even with the positives Stuckey can bring if he’s shooting a better overall percentage and getting to the line, the Pistons desperately need him to get better at making plays for teammates. That doesn’t mean he has to be Steve Nash, but if he can get that ratio up to 2.5-to-1ish range, that will be a huge improvement for him.

Key stats for Bynum: Bynum rebounded the ball better than Stuckey this preseason, which is pretty strange considering Bynum is really small and Stuckey, for some reason, has been labeled as a good rebounding guard even though it’s not backed up statistically. Bynum was also pretty consistent — he didn’t have any really great games or really poor ones, whereas Stuckey started slow and finished really strong.

He also improved drastically from the perimeter. He’s not going to be a three-point threat, but he can now knock the shot down enough that he can’t be left wide open out there.

Like Stuckey, he didn’t have a great assist-to-turnover ratio, something the Pistons desperately need out of whoever is their primary point guard this season.

The verdict: Stuckey is going to start, and it’s hard to argue, based on preseason, that he’s not deserving. Bynum had a stronger start, Stuckey had a stronger finish, and with Bynum sitting out the last two games, it’s pretty easy to see that Stuckey won this job.

Shooting Guard

The Candidates: Hamilton, Ben Gordon

The Preseason Stats:

  • Hamilton: 6 games/22.0 minutes/8.0 points/1.8 rebounds/3.0 assists/2.0 turnovers/39 percent shooting/31 percent three-point shooting/91 percent free throw shooting/- 6
  • Gordon: 8 games/25.3 minutes/11.2 points/2.3 rebounds/2.3 assists/2.4 turnovers/51 percent shooting 43 percent/32 percent three-point shooting/96 percent free throw shooting/- 3

The Per-36 Minute Stats:

  • Hamilton: 13.1 points/3.0 rebounds/4.9 assists/3.3 turnovers/3.0 free throws attempted
  • Gordon: 16.8 points/3.0 rebounds/3.2 assists/3.4 turnovers/4.3 free throws attempted

Key Stats for Hamilton: The only number I’m concerned with after watching Hamilton in the preseason is the 39 percent shooting. Hamilton’s a slow starter in his career, so typically a mediocre preseason is nothing to worry about. But his shooting percentage has been plummeting the last two seasons, and the preseason didn’t do anything to show he has his stroke back. His per-36 assist numbers were very good, and the Pistons generally have better movement and fewer isos when he’s on the floor because of his activity, but if he’s not hitting a high percentage of his shots, his value will continue to plummet.

Key Stats for Gordon: Gordon’s shooting stroke, on the other hand, looked like it was back at times. He shot the ball very well, finishing the preseason at 51 percent. (ED: Scratch that. Gordon only shot 43 percent in the preseason).His three-point stroke didn’t seem to come back either. Gordon only shot 32 percent from three-point range, which isn’t a good sign coming off a career-low last year in three-point percentage. Gordon also had more turnovers than assists in the preseason.

The Verdict: Virtually every statistic favors Gordon here. But as I mentioned above, Hamilton’s motion is a good fit on the floor whether he’s shooting well or not, whereas Gordon can be more of a ball-stopper. The Pistons also desperately need a bounceback season for Hamilton if they intend to trade him at some point. Taking away his starting job before the season started wouldn’t be the best way to convince team’s he’s healthy and ready to be semi-productive again. This is the only case in the starting five where there is a really strong case that the person who is likely to start may not have actually won the job in camp.

One number inverted in a spreadsheet can certainly mess things up. Hamilton and Gordon both shot poorly in the preseason. Hamilton shot slightly worse, but had more assists, turned it over less and is a better defensive player who doesn’t have to have the ball all the time on offense, unlike Gordon who doesn’t move without the ball the way Hamilton does. Basically, the Pistons need one of these two to be much more productive than they were in the preseason.

Small Forward

The Candidates: Tayshaun Prince, DaJuan Summers

The Preseason Stats:

  • Prince: 7 games/26.7 minutes/9.1 points/3.6 rebounds/2.7 assists/1.0 turnovers/48 percent shooting/56 percent three-point shooting/73 percent free throw shooting/+21
  • Summers: 8 games/15.0 minutes/6.1 points/1.9 rebounds/0.4 assists/0.6 turnovers/40 percent shooting/36 percent three-point shooting/80 percent free throw shooting/-44

The Per-36 Minute Stats:

  • Prince: 12.3 points/4.8 rebounds/3.7 assists/1.3 turnovers/2.9 free throws attempted
  • Summers: 14.7 points/4.5 rebounds/0.9 assists/1.5 turnovers/4.5 free throws attempted

Key Stats for Prince: Prince was the steadying influence he always is this preseason. He shot it well and he showed he’s the most efficient player with the ball that the Pistons have, with a per-36 assist-to-turnover ratio of nearly 4-to-1. The only real gripe (and it’s a minor one) is that with Daye playing at power forward, I would hope Prince’s rebounding numbers go up since Daye will need all the help he can get down low.

Key Stats for Summers: As his per-36 numbers suggest, Summers can provide a reasonable amount of scoring, and he does it in a variety of ways. He also shot a poor percentage from the floor, he was an astounding -44 for the preseason in just 120 minutes of action and he averaged less than one assist per-36 minutes.  Summers just doesn’t do much of anything except for score, and in the preseason, he didn’t do that efficiently.

The Verdict: With Tracy McGrady out and Daye getting pushed into the PF competition with the injury to Jonas Jerebko, it was hard to call this a competition. Summers never had a chance to unseat Prince, and even with Prince cruising through the preseason preserving his body for the regular season, he still easily out-performed Summers at the three spot.

Power Forward

The Candidates: Daye, Charlie Villanueva, Greg Monroe

The Preseason Stats:

  • Daye: 8 games/28.0 minutes/15.9 points/5.6 rebounds/1.5 assists/1.3 turnovers/47 percent shooting/50 percent three-point shooting/71 percent free throw shooting/+23
  • Villanueva: 7 games/22.9 minutes/12.3 points/3.9 rebounds/0.6 assists/1.3 turnovers/45 percent shooting/32 percent three-point shooting/79 percent free throw shooting/-25
  • Monroe: 8 games/25.3 minutes/7.8 points/4.9 rebounds/2.3 assists/2.0 turnovers/1.5 steals/41 percent shooting/71 percent free throw shooting/-20

The Per-36 Minute Stats:

  • Daye: 20.4 points/7.2 rebounds/1.9 assists/1.6 turnovers/0.8 steals/1.1 blocks/2.7 free throws attempted
  • Villanueva: 19.4 points/6.1 rebounds/0.9 assists/2.0 turnovers/1.1 steals/1.1 blocks/4.3 free throws attempted
  • Monroe: 11.0 points/7.0 rebounds/2.7 assists/2.9 turnovers/2.1 steals/0.5 blocks/5.5 free throws attempted

Key Stats for Daye: What else can be written about Daye? He was the most exciting player in the preseason, his confidence has grown tremendously since last year and as his per-36 stats show, he’s capable of doing a little bit of everything. His three-point shooting, over 50 percent in the preseason, will be a welcome addition to the lineup. Gordon and Villanueva never provided the shooting they were supposed to last season, and having a long range threat in the game is vital to unclogging some driving lanes for penetrating guards.

Key Stats for Villanueva: Villanueva started the preseason slow and finished strong. His scoring and shooting numbers were positive, and he the offseason talk about him being in great shape appears to be accurate as he looked healthy and mobile when he was on the court. His rebounding numbers were still poor.

Key Stats for Monroe: Monroe played a lot of minutes in the preseason, which is good. He also showed the passing skills that were hyped so much at Georgetown and, although it could be a preseason anomaly, he averaged nearly two steals per game. But there were also negatives — he shoot horribly for a big man (41 percent), he turned it over a lot (nearly three times per-36 minutes) and he often appeared timid as a rebounder.

The Verdict: Daye might be playing out of position as a future wing player in this league, but he’s too good to keep off the floor, and he clearly beat the other candidates at this position. Villanueva and Monroe are both used to playing down low, and Daye was a better rebounder than both of them. There’s a lot of debate as to whether playing out of position will be good or bad for Daye’s career or whether his slim body can hold up, but he’s young, smart and if his teammates provide good help for him defensively, Daye getting minutes that didn’t appear to be there for him when camp started will be a net win for the team.

Center

The Candidates: Wallace, Jason Maxiell

The Preseason Stats:

  • Wallace: 7 games/19.4 minutes/3.7 points/6.3 rebounds/1.3 assists/1.0 turnovers/1.1 steals/0.3 blocks/63 percent shooting/29 percent free throw shooting/+20
  • Maxiell: 5 games/21.0 minutes/5.4 points/4.2 rebounds/0.0 assists/1.6 turnovers/1.1 steals/1.4 blocks/45 percent shooting/58 percent free throw shooting/-19

The Per-36 Minute Stats:

  • Wallace: 6.9 points/11.6 rebounds/2.4 assists/1.9 turnovers/2.1 steals/0.5 blocks
  • Maxiell: 9.3 points/7.2 rebounds/0.0 assists/2.7 turnovers/1.7 steals/2.4 blocks

Key Stats for Wallace: Wallace’s per-36 rebounding and steals numbers are about what should be expected of him. Those numbers were very solid last season as well. It’s not a great idea to play him 36 minutes a night, but it’s clear he’s going to be their only rebounding presence and only good post defender this season.

The surprising number for Wallace is in blocks. Hopefully it’s just a preseason thing, because the Pistons could really use a shot-blocking presence with so many average or below average perimeter defenders, and Wallace has traditionally provided that.

Key Stats for Maxiell: Two categories jump out, one good and one bad. Maxiell blocked a lot of shots in the preseason, 2.4 per-36 minutes. Also, he played 105 preseason minutes and didn’t pick up a single assist.

Maxiell will provide good activity, some spectacular plays and some good games off the bench. He didn’t do anything in the preseason to really suggest he should get more or fewer minutes than he’s ever received in the Detroit rotation.

The Verdict: This was another positional “battle” that wasn’t very close. Wallace might be the Pistons best player overall, and he’s still easily their best big man. Chris Wilcox didn’t factor into the competition here, either, as his -19 in just nine preseason minutes will attest. You can pretty much mark down Wilcox for a -5 in the +/- category the second he steps on the court, before he even does a thing.

Conclusion

Injuries certainly made some of the positional battles a little anti-climactic, but I think it’s hard to argue that the players who performed the best in the preseason are starting for the Pistons. It’s impossible to tell if Kuester would’ve actually went through with the ‘open competition’ promise if Bynum had significantly out-played Stuckey in the preseason or if McGrady were healthy and out-played either Prince or Hamilton. Those were the two wildcard scenarios that could’ve led to a shakeup of the lineup, but neither played out and the Pistons starting lineup (except for Daye) will be a familiar one on opening night.

Share:

email
Twitter
Facebook
Google Bookmarks
del.icio.us
BallHype-NBA
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Yahoo! Buzz
Print




PistonPowered

Preseason minutes don’t mean much, but John Kuester has done a nice job with the Detroit Pistons rotation so far

Chip Crain from the great Memphis Grizzlies blog 3 Shades of Blue sent me an e-mail Wednesday asking about Rodney Stuckey’s 37 minutes of action in the Pistons last preseason game against the Wizards.

The number seemed high to Crain, who pointed out that no Grizzlies other than Marc Gasol had hit the 30-minute mark this preseason, and he only did so because of foul trouble to Hasheem Thabeet.

The e-mail had me panicking a little bit. Obviously, with only one Pistons game televised so far this preseason, I haven’t been able to watch. And with camp invitees Ike Diogu and Vernon Hamilton getting cut after barely touching the court, I started thinking about a repeat of last year, when there was never a clear rotation (some due to injuries, some due to inexplicably playing Chris Wilcox). I was hoping the preseason wasn’t going to be an indication of more of the same — too many minutes for some players, not nearly enough for others.

But after gleaning back at the box scores, my fears are alleviated. Kuester has actually done a really good job with preseason minutes. Here are some positives so far:

Will Bynum is leading the team in minutes per game

Will Bynum (and his snappy shoes) is the only Piston getting 30 minutes per night. I don’t know that this is going to carry over into the regular season, but it certainly can’t be a bad sign. Bynum had a great preseason a year ago, and did so while getting limited minutes and facing the reality that he probably wouldn’t play much once the regular season started.

This year, he might be in similar circumstances, but it at least appears with both his heavy preseason workload and Kuester at least toying with the idea of Rodney Stuckey coming off the bench that Bynum is going to figure into the Pistons’ plans much more heavily to start this season.

Ultimately, starting Bynum is not going to be the difference between the Pistons being a good or bad team. But Bynum has clearly worked exceptionally hard at his game the last three years, so it would be nice to see that rewarded, not to mention he’s arguably the most exciting player the Pistons have, so getting him on the court as much as possible could do wonders for the team’s watchability.

Every player is getting rest

The Pistons have five players coming off of injuries — Bynum, Rip Hamilton, Tayshaun Prince, Charlie Villanueva, Ben Gordon — and a sixth in Ben Wallace who plays a physically demanding position, has an injury history and is getting older. So far, Kuester has done a really good job of getting all of them minutes and also resting them.

Bynum, Hamilton, Wallace, Prince and Villanueva have all had a game off during the preseason. Gordon hasn’t had a game off, but he also seems to be in really good shape, and he’s only playing 27.4 minutes per game (although his 39 minutes in the second preseason game might have been excessive).

Wallace, who wore down after a heavy workload last year, is playing only 17 minutes per game in the six he’s played in. Prince, who has played really well, hasn’t played more than 28 minutes in a preseason game, and he didn’t do so for the first time until after he’d had a game off to rest.

The young guys are actually playing

Austin Daye (26.7) and Greg Monroe (26.2) are fourth and fifth on the team in minutes played this preseason, respectively.

It’s unreasonable to expect that either will play more minutes than Hamilton (21.0), Prince (25.0) or even Wallace (17.8) during the season, but it does represent progress for a team that has developed a reputation for not trusting its young guys much over the last 10 years or so.

They have undoubtedly played so much out of necessity with Jonas Jerebko hurt, further diluting the frontcourt depth. But the fact is both have had good moments (particularly Daye) this preseason, and both have done enough to reasonably expect to be solidly in the rotation once the regular season starts.

Does it mean anything for the regular season rotation?

How minutes will be distributed has obviously been an ongoing point of heated debate among Pistons fans. And the absences of Jerebko and Tracy McGrady have helped Kuester in the preseason avoide some tough decisions.

Currently, the projected top nine in the Detroit rotation (Stuckey, Bynum, Gordon, Hamilton, Prince, Daye, Wallace, Villanueva, Monroe) are averaging about 223 of a possible 240 minutes. Wallace and Hamilton, and possibly Villanueva, are sure to see their numbers go up some, Monroe and Daye will probably see slight decreases. McGrady, after missing most of the preseason, probably won’t be ready for a big workload immediately to start the season as the likely 10th man in the rotation.

And Jason Maxiell figures to be in line for at least spot minutes, or perhaps bigger minutes on some nights because of Monroe’s bouts with foul trouble.

There are plenty of questions the Pistons still have to answer position-wise, but credit where it’s due, Kuester has done a pretty solid job with the rotation to this point. It will be interesting to see if he can strike the same harmonious balance once the regular season starts.

Share:

email
Twitter
Facebook
Google Bookmarks
del.icio.us
BallHype-NBA
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Yahoo! Buzz
Print




PistonPowered

BlogPoll Calling: Preseason Top 25 DRAFT

Ok folks, here it is. Any explanations* I may have for the ordering will be roundly laughed at and/or rejected in the comments, so I’m not even going to bother.  Still, this is just a draft that can be changed between now and 9am tomorrow morning, so if you there’s anything on here you just absolutely cannot abide, voice it and I’ll take it into consideration before submitting the final ballot.

* like you rabble even deserve an explanation in the first place…

Roll ‘Bama Roll

AP Releases Preseason College Football Top 25, Surprises Absent

College football coaches released their preseason top 25 two weeks ago, and now, it’s the media’s turn with the release of the AP top 25 poll. Unsurprisingly, the two voting blocs have very similar tastes.

Alabama is the runaway No. 1 choice in both polls. West Virginia is either tied for 24th or 25th in both. And there’s plenty of similarity in between – indeed, every team in both polls except for USC in the AP poll and Utah in the coaches poll is the same. And USC’s only absent from the coaches poll because the NCAA’s sanctions against the program barred them from the poll this season.

Sure, there are differences in the order of the teams. LSU is 21st in the AP poll, 16th in the coaches poll. Penn State is 19th in the AP poll, 14th in the coaches poll. But by and large, these are two very similar sets of rankings. (We would, however, like to know which generous AP poll voter gave Oklahoma a No. 1 vote.)

Almost the same teams, similar orders – and all based on last season, projection, and preconceived notions. And it’s influential. And the assumptions made now will guide the voters all year. Too much influence for a poll to have, when there’s not even one game’s worth of evidence to back it up? We’d say so.

A preseason top 25 is ingrained in the culture of college football, and it’s a reminder that the season is gloriously close at hand. But games, not guesses, should decide poll results, and the idea of having such a poll before the season even starts is more than a little crazy. There shouldn’t be one. Stay tuned in the coming days for SportsGrid’s preseason college football top 25.

Photo via

SportsGrid

Alabama Ranked No. 1 in the AP Preseason Poll

For now, all is right with the world.

For now, all is right with the world.

The Associated Press unveiled their pre-season college football poll today and the Alabama Crimson Tide were No. 1. Of the 60 sportswriters and broadcasters from across the country who cast ballots in the poll, 55 chose Alabama as the best team in the country. Ohio State came in second with three first-place votes, but no other team besides the Tide and the Buckeyes received more than a single vote.

Interestingly enough, Alabama has started the season in the No. 1 slot of the AP poll only one time before, in 1978. And furthermore, the Crimson Tide have inaugurated their season in the AP’s top five only a total of 16 times.

Pre Season AP Rank Year Final Record Achievements
No. 1 1978 11-1-0 National Champions, SEC Champions
No. 2
1967
1975
1979
1980
1993
8-2-1
11-1-0
12-0-0
10-2-0
9-3-1*
SEC Champions
National Champions, SEC Champions
National Champions, SEC Champions
No. 3
1961
1962
1963
1966
1974
2000
11-0-0
10-1-0
9-2-0
11-0-0
11-1-0
3-8-0
National Champions, SEC Champions
SEC Champions
SEC Champions
No. 4
1981
1982
9-2-1
8-4-0
SEC Champions
No. 5
1965
1986
9-1-1
10-3-0
National Champions, SEC Champions

* Nine games from this season were later forfeited by the NCAA

For a program with thirteen national championships on its resume, some may find it surprising that Alabama hasn’t been more of a staple on the higher end of the preseason polls. Furthermore, Alabama hasn’t frequently found itself at the top of the rankings throughout the season either.

Since the Associated Press began ranking teams in 1936, Alabama has entered games ranked No. 1 on only 29 occasions, boasting a 23-6-0 record (.793) in those contests.

Season Opponent (rank) W/L Score Date Location Game
1961 Auburn W 34-0 Dec. 2 Birmingham, AL
1961 Arkansas (9) W 10-3 Jan. 1, 1962 New Orleans, LA Sugar Bowl
1962 Tulane W 44-6 Sept. 28 New Orleans, LA
1962 Houston W 14-3 Oct. 13 Tuscaloosa, AL
1962 Georgia Tech L 6-7 Nov. 17 Atlanta, GA
1964 Texas (5) L 17-21 Jan. 1, 1965 Miami, FL Orange Bowl
1973 Auburn W 35-0 Dec. 1 Birmingham, AL
1973 Notre Dame (3) L 23-24 Dec. 31 New Orleans, LA Sugar Bowl
1978 Nebraska (10) W 20-3 Sept. 2 Birmingham, AL
1978 Missouri (11) W 38-20 Sept. 16 Colombia, MO
1978 USC (7) L 14-24 Sept. 23 Birmingham, AL
1979 Tennessee (18) W 27-17 Oct. 20 Birmingham, AL
1979 Virginia Tech W 31-7 Oct. 27 Tuscaloosa, AL
1979 Miss. State W 24-7 Nov. 3 Tuscaloosa, AL
1979 LSU W 3-0 Nov. 10 Baton Rouge, LA
1979 Miami W 30-0 Nov. 17 Tuscaloosa, AL
1979 Auburn (14) W 25-18 Dec. 1 Birmingham, AL
1980 Ole Miss W 59-35 Sept. 20 Jackson, MS
1980 Vanderbilt W 41-0 Sept. 27 Tuscaloosa, AL
1980 Kentucky W 45-0 Oct. 4 Birmingham, AL
1980 Rutgers W 17-13 Oct. 11 East Rutherford, NJ
1980 Tennessee W 27-0 Oct. 18 Knoxville, TN
1980 Southern Miss. (20) W 42-7 Oct. 25 Tuscaloosa, AL
1980 Miss. State L 3-6 Nov. 1 Jackson, MS
2008 LSU W 27-21 (OT) Nov. 8 Baton Rouge, LA
2008 Miss. State W 32-7 Nov. 15 Tuscaloosa, AL
2008 Auburn W 36-0 Nov. 29 Tuscaloosa, AL
2008 Florida L 20-31 Dec. 6 Atlanta, GA SECCG
2009 Texas (2) W 37-21 Jan. 7, 2010 Pasadena, CA

BCSNCG

 

The reasoning behind this should perhaps come as no real surprise. At the risk of sounding like a conspiracy theorist, Alabama has never been a team that has been historically hyped in media circles. Traditionally speaking, you can look through our history and find that even most of our greatest national championship teams didn’t earn a number one ranking until very late in the year, when everyone else had either fallen by the wayside or had been defeated by the Tide.

That same song and dance largely played out in 1961, 1964, 1973, 1978, 1992, and 2009, which is to say nothing of the Bryant teams in 1966 and 1973 that were arguably robbed by the pollsters of their rightful crowns. The years in which the national media quickly jumped on the ‘Bama bandwagon early in the season are indeed few and far in between.

For our 2010 team, though, none of that likely matters. As defending national champions, we’ve largely assumed our rightful place for now. We’re still ranked number one, and should retain that lofty status until someone knocks us off of our perch. No team could legitimately ask for more with the dawn of a new season near.

Roll ‘Bama Roll

Ex Tide and current Chiefs CB Javier Arena KR for a TD in last nights preseason game against the…

Ex Tide and current Chiefs CB Javier Arena KR for a TD in last nights preseason game against the Falcons. (sadly the play was called back because of a un needed hold)

Roll ‘Bama Roll