LPGA Votes To Allow Transgendered Players On Tour

In what is shaping up to be a landmark year for transgendered athletes in sports, LPGA players today voted to allow transgendered golfers the opportunity to play on tour.

Lana Lawless of San Francisco sued the LPGA because she (though formerly a “he”) claimed that the LPGA’s rule that golfers must be female at birth violated California’s civil rights laws.  Her lawsuit also attempted to block the LPGA from holding events in California.  Instead of bringing the matter to court, the tour decided to allow Lawless the chance to play professionally.

Lawless won the long-drive world championship in 2008 before being barred the next year by the Long Drivers of America, who also played the “female at birth” card that the LPGA used before the lawsuit.  So it’s not as if she’s just a troublemaker – she obviously has a good chance of being successful on tour.

It can be argued that transgendered players have the unfair advantage of developing stronger muscles (as a male) before their sex change procedures. But it would be wrong to assume that people make golf a major consideration in deciding to become a woman. 

And whatever your views on gay rights, it seems logical that anybody who is technically a woman should be allowed to play on the LPGA Tour. After all, judging by last night’s vote, it made sense to the players.

Photo via

SportsGrid

LPGA Passes Vote to Allow Transgender Membership

Lana Lawless, a transgender woman, is suing the LPGA

The LPGA voted to lift the “female at birth” clause in its constitution bylaws on Tuesday evening at a player meeting in Grand Cypress Hyatt, just a hop, skip and small jump away from the site of this week’s LPGA Tour Championship.

Commissioner Mike Whan presented the situation, citing examples of other organizations that allow transgender membership, such as the USGA and IOC. The move to amend the clause was easily passed, says an LPGA player, who wishes to remain anonymous. She added it was a non-issue. The players understood that it was in the best interest of the LPGA to make the change because it would have been a losing battle to contend the lawsuit filed by Lana Lawless, a 57-year-old transgender woman who had gender reassignment surgery in 2005.

Lawless’ lawyer threatened to seek an injunction to prevent the LPGA from doing business in California if the members voted against overturning the clause that all members have to be female at birth. However, Lawless is still suing the LPGA for lost pay.

While the players have their personal opinions and some didn’t agree with it, they voted in favor of the move. Earlier in the day, several players said they would have liked Lawless to attend the meeting, so she could explain her case because they wanted to make a well-informed decision. But when the time came to vote, the players were aware that the precedent had been set by other organizations and knew what they had to do. They also didn’t want the controversy to overshadow an exciting tournament week with the season-ending Tour Championship.

Whan shared the 2011 schedule with the players at the meeting, too. Apparently there were no surprises and it’s better than expected. Some events aren’t set in stone, so the LPGA is holding off on making any announcements, but the players were told for planning purposes. Compared to the total money from this season, the ladies will have more earning potential next season. Whan and the LPGA are working on some deals that could still come into fruition for 2011. But word is that 2012 looks very promising for the tour.

Share

Wei Under Par

LPGA Hall Of Famer Carol Mann Does Not Want To See This “Ground Zero Mosque” Built

Carol Mann is the owner of a long, distinguished career as both a golfer and proponent of the game – one that’s landed her in the sport’s Hall of Fame, and earned her a position as special ambassador to the Hall of Fame as well. But with such notoriety comes the scrutiny of being a public figure, and she recently created a rather unwelcome controversy for the sport she’s worked so hard to promote.

The controversy, as with most controversies lately, centers around the “Ground Zero Mosque,” otherwise known as Park 51/community center (or, if you’re feeling REALLY controversial, 9-11 mosque/victory mosque). Mann doesn’t think it should be built, and said so on her (public) Facebook page in no uncertain terms:

I am against the Muslim worship center at Ground Zero because it’s too much of a flagrant demonstration of our own “tolerance” out of control. I do not believe the Muslims are children of the God I know, the one who sacrificed His only Son, Jesus, to provide forgiveness and salvation for us without earning it by “works….” All we have to do is believe in Christ and we gain His Kingdom. The United States is a Christian country, founded on Christian principles and with an expectation of Christian behavior. Let the Muslims erect their worship centers in other countries that are not Christian. Go away – soon!

It actually starts off very even-keeled, not even referring to the proposed building as a “mosque,” but then the “at Ground Zero” erases any doubt this post is going to raise some serious eyebrows (since, you know, this). From there on Mann frames it as a straight-up Christianity vs. Islam battle, and then that last sentence. Oh, that last sentence.

We won’t get into the contentious, contentious debate about this issue too much, but we will say that Brooks over at SportsByBrooks seems rather ambivalent about the Park 51 project, but also refers to Mann as “blinded by bigotry.” Make of that what you will.

Stephanie Wei of Wei Under Par, meanwhile, called it “rather extraordinary” that an ambassador like Mann would make a worldview that is, shall we say, narrow in nature such public information.

Wei is correct – Mann’s ongoing association with an official, worldwide golf organization is the key here. As Wei also noted, Mann has every right to express her opinion in a public forum…but that only means she shouldn’t get arrested for it.

The World Golf Hall of Fame, however, can do what it pleases. They declined comment to Wei Under Par, but you can bet they’re not happy with all this attention Mann’s bringing in. Mann, again, can say whatever she wants, but she also has to deal with the consequences. Don’t be surprised if the end result in this case is the World Golf Hall of Fame telling her to go away – soon!

Screengrab of Mann’s Facebook pontificating, also via Wei Under Par:

Photo via

SportsGrid

LPGA Icon Juli Inskter Was Disqualified This Weekend, Thanks To…TV Viewer?

Thought rules violations in golf couldn’t get any weirder than Dustin Johnson’s PGA Championship nightmare? Unfortunately for Juli Inkster, you’d be wrong. Inkster was disqualified from the Safeway Classic over the weekend (eventually won by Ai Miyazato) after a TV viewer caught her swinging a weighted club to warm up, a rules violation.

Inkster had a solid reason to take extra warmup precautions: her round was delayed by excess traffic ahead of her on the course. In her words, “I had a 30-minute wait and I need to loosen up.” But TV cameras showed her loosening up, and a viewer with an amazingly tight grasp on the golf rulebook couldn’t in good conscience let the infraction pass – so they notified the tournament.

And it’s not like this was just the capper to a rough weekend – Inkster was just three shots back of the lead. This is a seven-time major champion – she was capable of making a run. But it wasn’t to be, leaving her only able to say, “It is what it is,” and that she was (understandably) “very disappointed.”

So whose obscure violation was more crushing: Inkster’s or Johnson’s? For the enormity of the moment ruined, Johnson wins – not only was it a major, but his violation took him out of contention on the last hole of the entire tournament, while Inkster was DQ’d on Saturday.

But for the sheer improbability of the DQ – well, that has to go to Inkster. The combination of getting such a seemingly innocuous act 1) caught on camera and 2) caught by a fan THAT observant, THAT well-aware of golf’s rules and THAT protective of them – not to mention the fact that the bad luck of having her round delayed that necessitated the warmup – is nearly impossible to fathom.

Still, as Stephanie Wei noted, Inkster should have known the rule. If a random TV viewer notices it, one of the finest LPGAers ever definitely should. And yet – we can’t help but feel bad for both her and Johnson. Rules are rules, but that doesn’t mean rules can’t also be a bit odd.

Photo via

SportsGrid

LPGA Raises Charity Purse to $1 Million for Founders Cup

The LPGA announced Friday more improvements to the inaugural RR Donnelley LPGA Founders Cup. First, the total amount donated toRead the Rest…

Wei Under Par